AI Search Readiness for AIVisibility

Mixed: 69/100

4 checks need attention. Top fixes are listed below.

Last run August 30, 2026.

Partial audit result

The website checks completed, but some AI evidence was unavailable. The score excludes skipped checks rather than treating them as failures.

  • 6 AI probes were incomplete; affected checks were skipped or based only on completed evidence.
  • AI category inference used a conservative fallback; answer probes still ran, but category-specific recommendations may be less precise.

Keep this baseline and see what changes next

Save the report, get the prioritized action plan, and compare future re-audits.

Save my action plan

Share the evidence, not just the score

ChatGPT evidence · Audited August 30, 2026

Download image
69/ 100

Mixed

AI engines find you sometimes — but several signals are missing.

Passing
15
Warnings
5
Failing
4
Skipped
6

Low buyer-query visibility

AI does not consistently recognize or recommend your brand yet.

Publish these five focused pages to strengthen category, use-case, and comparison signals across AI answers.

  1. 1. Canonical product definition page with a 25-50 word description.
  2. 2. Best business software for teams evaluating AIVisibility page.
  3. 3. top competitor alternatives page
  4. 4. Pricing or plan comparison page with a real table.
  5. 5. Third-party directory/list placements that cite your category.

Top fixes

Highest-impact issues first, ranked by severity.

  • Quotable product definition near topFailcontent.product_definition_likely

    A clear definition of what your product is appears in the first 300 words AI engines extract.

    Evidence: No clear definition pattern in the first 300 words.

    Fix: Add a 25–50 word definition above the fold matching the template: "<Brand> is <category> that <primary function>, <key differentiator>." AI engines often cite this verbatim.

  • Brand recognized in AI enginesFailai_visibility.brand_recognized

    AI engines recognize your brand by name with a non-trivial description.

    Evidence: No engine described the brand in a recognizable way. Likely entity-resolution failure.

    Fix: Build entity signals: complete Organization JSON-LD, claim/expand directory listings (LinkedIn, Crunchbase, G2, Wikidata), and publish a few authoritative third-party mentions.

  • Cited in category buying queriesFailai_visibility.cited_in_category_query

    Your brand appears when buyers ask AI for the best tools in your category.

    Evidence: Not cited in "best business software" by any engine.

    Fix: Get listed in third-party best-of articles, G2/Capterra category pages, and HN/Reddit category discussions. AI engines pull category lists from these sources.

  • sameAs profile links presentFailentity.same_as_profiles_present

    Schema links your brand to authoritative external profiles AI engines trust.

    Evidence: No sameAs links on the entity node.

    Fix: In your Organization schema, add a sameAs array for authoritative profiles your brand already maintains, such as LinkedIn, GitHub, Crunchbase, or a major product directory.

  • Pricing visible or linkedWarncontent.pricing_visible

    Pricing is visible or one click away — AI engines extract this constantly.

    Evidence: Pricing link found (/pricing) but no pricing table on the homepage.

    Fix: Surface a pricing summary (3 tiers, headline price each) on the homepage or above-the-fold of /pricing. AI engines pull from tables far more reliably than from prose.

Full check breakdown

All 24 evaluated checks across 7 dimensions.

AI visibility

Whether AI engines actually mention you for buyer-intent queries.

33/100
  • Brand recognized in AI enginesFail

    No engine described the brand in a recognizable way. Likely entity-resolution failure.

  • Brand description accurateSkipped

    Skipped — AI answers could not be evaluated against the site description.

  • Cited in category buying queriesFail

    Not cited in "best business software" by any engine.

  • Recommended for primary use casePass

    Recommended by Perplexity for teams evaluating AIVisibility.

  • Surfaces in competitor comparisonsSkipped

    Skipped — no obvious competitor identified from the site copy.

Answer accuracy

Whether AI engines describe your product without contradicting your site.

  • AI describes core features accuratelySkipped

    Skipped — AI answers could not be evaluated.

  • AI describes target audience accuratelySkipped

    Skipped — AI answers could not be evaluated.

  • No contradictory claims about the productSkipped

    Skipped — engines did not return brand-specific answers that could be checked.

  • AI describes pricing accuratelySkipped

    Skipped — no ground truth extractable from the site.

Entity signals

Whether AI engines can identify your brand as a distinct entity.

61/100
  • Organization schema presentPass

    Found Organization with name, url, and description.

  • sameAs profile links presentFail

    No sameAs links on the entity node.

  • Brand name consistent across signalsWarn

    Brand name missing from: og:title

  • Canonical URL setWarn

    Canonical host (aivisibility.io) differs from base host (factsentry.ai).

  • Logo or hero image declaredPass

    og:image set

Content & citability

Whether your homepage gives AI engines quotable answers.

65/100
  • Meta description in citation rangePass

    Meta description is 107 characters.

  • Quotable product definition near topFail

    No clear definition pattern in the first 300 words.

  • FAQ content presentPass

    6 FAQ entries with FAQPage schema.

  • Pricing visible or linkedWarn

    Pricing link found (/pricing) but no pricing table on the homepage.

  • Use case or audience statedPass

    Detected 2 audience/use-case signals.

Digital PR for AI sources

Whether the action plan should prioritize authoritative third-party sources AI engines cite.

50/100
  • Directory inclusion recommendedWarn

    AI engines did not recognize the brand, so the action plan should include trusted directory placements.

  • Authoritative source placement recommendedWarn

    No engine cited AIVisibility in category buying queries.

Machine-readability

Whether your markup is machine-readable enough to parse cleanly.

100/100
  • Valid JSON-LD on homepagePass

    10 typed JSON-LD blocks present.

  • Clean heading hierarchyPass

    Clean hierarchy: 1 H1, 5 H2 sections.

  • Semantic HTML landmarks presentPass

    4/4 semantic landmarks present.

  • Tables or lists for parallel dataPass

    7 lists on the page (no tables, but rich list usage).

Trust signals

Whether trust and recency signals are present.

100/100
  • HTTPS enforcedPass

    Site served over HTTPS.

  • Privacy policy link presentPass

    Privacy link: /legal/privacy-policy

  • Terms of service link presentPass

    Terms link: /legal/privacy-policy

  • Contact channel visiblePass

    Contact page: /contact

  • Recency signal presentPass

    Found 2026 or 2025 on the page.

Want the full prioritized fix list?

Sign up free to save the baseline and action plan for AIVisibility. Paid plans add ongoing monitoring, competitor benchmarks, and prioritized fix lists.

Save my action plan